Lifting Operations

News

A Smaller Telecrawler

3 October 2019, By Cranes Today Magazine

For more than 50 years the concept of the telecrawler crane has intrigued the industry. Labelled, until recently, as a ‘niche’, the cranes are taking an increasing share of the market. Here, Stuart Anderson assesses the market in the smallest swing cab models, up to 30t capacity.

The first manufacturers to combine a tele boom crane with a crawler undercarriage were Grove in 1967 with their 25USt (22.7t) 225-T, followed by Coles Cranes in 1968 with the 12t capacity Hydra 120-TC. Since the Grove was also equipped with outriggers taken from its original truck crane sister machine, the Coles was the first free-on-tracks crane. Only two Grove 225Ts were sold, and while the Coles appealed to leading crane hirers such as Sparrows they proved to be the exception, and production soon ended.

Independent of these earlier efforts, in 1971 Kato Works Ltd. introduced the 16t capacity NK- 160C which would become the first successful telecrawler crane with over 250 sold. While the crane enjoyed sales in Western Europe, Russia and Oceania, the key to success was its ability to work in narrow and confined jobsites in its home market of Japan. Kato used a crawler undercarriage taken from its line of excavators which, similarly, was a fixed-gauge design with consequent limitations to over-side stability and capacity.

Table 1: 4.9-8t telecrawlers

The first manufacturer to overcome this performance limitation was not ‘one of the big boys’ but a small, diversified engineering company based in Franklin, Tennessee named SpanDeck Engineering. Led by Bill Mitchell who had formerly worked on crawler tractors for International Harvester Company, he then built small telecrawler cranes used to assemble oil storage tanks for Pittsburgh Des Moines Steel (PDM). PDM had subcontracted the renowned former Manitowoc senior crane engineer Roche J ‘Bud’ Van de Hey of Manitowoc ‘Vicon’ fame, working at his farm in Oregon to design the crane which was named the ‘Turtle’.

Table 2: 12-16t telecrawlers

PDM wanted a crane that could pass through an 8ft x 8ft (2.4m x 2.4m) door in the side of the tank which led the designer to equip the crane (for the first time) with hydraulically-extendable tracks. The 13USt capacity ‘Turtle’ subsequently gave birth to the ‘Mantis’ 3612 of 18USt (16t) capacity introduced at ConExpo 1981. Some 250 of these would be sold, with many going to utility contractors across North America as well as to the likes of the Provincial Electricity Authority (PEA) of Thailand and leading Brazilian contractor Odebrecht. Under the leadership of Bill Mitchell and his son Bill Jr. the ‘Mantis’ line steadily developed, and was acquired ten years ago by Tadano.

By the early 1980s Japanese production of mini crawler excavators exceeded 20,000 per year and within a couple of years their manufacturers were converting these into mini crawler cranes. The first to do this was Nissan Kazai Nice with their 2.9t capacity S&B-C3, introduced in 1984, followed in 1988 by IHI with their CCH-50T of 4.9t capacity that would become the first successful mini crawler crane selling worldwide.

A host of Japanese mini excavator makers—Aichi Sharyo, Hitachi, Maeda, Kobelco, Komatsu, Nagano, Nippon Sharyo, Shin Caterpillar Mitsubishi and Sumitomo—duly entered the field, generally using tele booms purchased from Tadano or Furukawa-Unic. Like mini excavators, these were 360° slew cranes with well-appointed swing cabs, tele booms typically of up to 13m length and rubber tracks of fixed gauge with nominal lifting capacities limited to 4.9t to avoid operator-licensing requirements.

During the 1990s these mini cranes established a solid market with large numbers found on urban public works projects, not only in Japan but also in similarly congested Sout East Asian markets such as Singapore, Hong Kong and Taiwan and eventually in the UK and Europe. Boom lengths continued to increase, reaching 20m extendable to approximately 24m with short fly jibs.

Although built to high-quality standards, these excavator-based cranes continued to suffer from two fundamental limitations. Due to their narrow, fixedgauge crawlers, lifting capacities over-side were weak and their pick-and-carry capacities were typically limited to 2t. While users could recognize the performance benefits of mini crawler cranes, for many years market growth outside of South East Asia and Japan was hindered by the struggle to ‘make them pay’ in hire fleets.

Along came a Spider

Starting in 1980 but gathering pace during the 1990s and 2000s, Maeda, followed by Furukawa- Unic, developed full lines of ‘Spider’ type mini crawler cranes. Featuring extremely-compact machine bodies of between 1m and 2m width these lightweight cranes achieved their lifting performance from their long outrigger arms that provided blocking dimensions of up to 6m x 6m.

Spider cranes eventually achieved capacities of up to 10t capacity but the vast majority of units sold are of 2.9-4t capacity blocked-on-outriggers. Their very light weight and small dimensions made for lower capital costs and much easier, much less-costly trucking as well as superior site access. A winning combination: with the net effect of severelyeroding market demand for the smaller-sized excavator-based swing-cab crawler cranes. Komatsu, IHI, Nagano and Hitachi, once major players, have long since exited this teleboom crawler crane sector, with only used-machines generally available.

Our study encompasses swing cab cranes of 4.9-to-30t capacity – 22 models in all. It does not include several even-smaller swing cab tele crawler cranes such as the non-slewing 2t capacity Galizia GK 20 and the full-specification Maeda CC 423S-1 of 2.93t capacity x 1.5m radius and a working weight of just 4.4t.

The cranes covered can be roughly divided into three size classes:

  • 5-to-8t capacity: 7 models. The defining specifications of these cranes are: Long booms of 15-16m length; fully-appointed swing cabs, steel or rubber/ Geogrip tracks, very-compact dimensions including limited tail swing and transport width of 2.5m.
  • 12-16t capacity: 5 models. Telescopic booms typically of 15-20m length with optional fly jibs (the exception being the 16t Sunward SWTC 16B with a 31.3m boom). Most models feature hydraulic track extension and working weights of 15-28t. However, in this class, only the Sennebogen 613E is designed to compact criteria.
  • 20-to-30t capacity: 10 models. Telescopic booms ranging from 22 to 37m length. These are small rather than ‘mini’ tele boom crawler cranes with a greater emphasis on capacity and reach. Dimensionally, the European machines are typically moretransportable and compact than the Chinese cranes. Tadano- Mantis recently discontinued its popular 18 and 30USt (16 and 27t) models, the latter replaced by the new 35USt (32t) GTC 350.

The growth in demand for tele crawler cranes in China has been a phenomenon in recent years – sparking new as well as existing manufacturers to enter this class of crane. There is limited demand in China for ‘mini’ crawler cranes although this is developing. As with truck cranes, 25-tonners are the most popular size, followed by 50-55-tonners. As reflected in our study there are no less than ten Chinese models in these small size-classes alone with XCMG, Sany and Sunward making life very-challenging for the smaller players. As usual price competition amongst the Chinese is fierce. To date, exports beyond Asia have been minimal – limited by distribution, product support and the lack of regulatory compliance including EN 13000. However, the UK’s GGR does now offer a 5t capacity CE-certified model, named the MCC 500D and based on the Sunward SWTC 5/5C. A larger 10t capacity Sunward model is also being introduced by GGR.

Like many UK crane hirers. Dorset, UK-based Jones Crawler Cranes has transitioned much of its fleet in favour of telecrawler cranes. In addition to a 55t Marchetti, Jones recently added their first mini crawler crane in the shape of a Maeda CC 985. Managing director Mark Jones professes to “love everything about the machine” and to be “impressed with its build quality” adding that “the low emissions make this machine especially useful for us”.

Key Benefits

Key purchasing considerations vary between the smaller and larger class cranes. The emphasis in European and Japanese designs is very-much focussed on compactness, refined performance, and transportability. Manufacturing small cranes to these design parameters is very challenging and pound-for-pound more costly than larger-sized cranes to the extent that the cost of crawler cranes of 5-to-9t capacity can rival those of 25-tonners. Nevertheless their appeal continues to expand thanks to numerous unique application and performance benefits.

Clearance heights on some models are as low as under 2.5m allowing them to access low doors, tunnels, etc. that other types of mobile cranes cannot enter thus opening such markets as mining and underground road and rail infrastructure. By fitting wide triple grouser tracks or extra-wide trapezoidal swamp pads, these cranes achieve very-low ground bearing pressures for use on such projects as pipelining or electric utility-line construction and maintenance on very soft or even swampy terrain. Rubber/Geogrip track-pads allow the cranes to operate on surfaces prone to damage. The combination of rubber tracks, low centre of gravity and compact dimensions also make these cranes ideal for working on elevated bridges and similarly potentially-hazardous elevated job sites.

The option of radio remote control available on many models allows these cranes to operate in potentially-dangerous environments or where operator visibility of the jobsite might be hindered.

Most models are available with hoists allowing considerable rope spooling capacity for hoisting and lowering to depths as great as 100m below grade.

Fully mobile lifting performance allows these cranes to position and install such items as road/noise barriers, panel work, tunnel liners, etc. By installing earth-augers and elevated work platforms they can erect power transmission lines on un-prepared ground.

Small machines with tracks retracted can achieve clearance widths as small as 2.5m and not only travel but ‘lift’ at such operating widths. Many machines combine zero or limited tail swing with long booms capable of working at steep angles, allowing them to reach heights up to 20- 35m in site spaces too-narrow for most mobile cranes. This allows them to work in busy urban areas – for example installing plate glass using suction pads – with minimal disruption to traffic-flow.

Compared to the exposed operator’s seat of ‘Spider’ cranes, the sealed, heated and air-conditioned operator’s cabs of small crawler cranes afford operator with a safer working environment protected from the weather and site hazards as well as dust, sand, etc. The cabs also afford protection and security to the electronics, controls, instruments and personal effects of the operator. Some models are offered with cabs fitted with steel windscreen grids and/or roof guards for FOPs protection.

Barge work is an ideal application for telecrawlers: the swing cab is essential for field-of vision and safety and the crawler undercarriage provides a stable base that can be easily tied-down as needed.

Several smaller-sized models are available with dozer blades that add a level of extra stability and can be used for backfilling trenches and other jobs. Many medium-tolarger sized models are available with optional man baskets and forklift attachments or even ropesuspended hydraulic grabs.

Customers are constantly discovering new applications for these cranes that might otherwise have been thought to demand larger mobile or small tower cranes. In an ever more-crowded world with ever-increasing demands on space, fuel-economy and environmental friendliness, smaller-sized machines are increasingly favoured.

The Latest Models

At Bauma. mini crawler crane market-leader Maeda introduced its largest model to date – the 8.1t capacity CC 1908 S-1, its fourth swing cab crane joining a strong line of spider cranes. The CC 1908S-1 is rated 8.1t at 2.7m radius and is equipped with a fivesection hexagonal boom offering 20.1m maximum lift height which can be increased to 26.0m with the optional fly jib. Maximum working radius is 19.2m and maximum pick-and-carry capacity is 3.5t.

New features of the CC 1908 include a ten-inch (254mm) touchscreen monitor display, surround view camera and boom slew limit setting. The operator’s cab is fully-enclosed and airconditioned with sliding door and new wide-view roof window with sun shade. It has a two-speed winch allowing either two, four or six-part reeving, hydrostatic transmission, a tilt sensor/alarm as well as an anti-slack device.

Commenting on the new crane, Anthony Heeks, managing director of Pace Cranes, based in Sydney, said: “It’s ideal for working in confined areas and construction sites for working up-and-over objects with the hydraulic luffing and telescoping fly jib. Its 3.5t Pick-and-carry capacities are a major improvement while its minimal tail swing make it ideal for indoor work as well. We expect to see the model in full production in the 3rd quarter of this year with units landing in Australia shortly thereafter.” Pace has been the Maeda distributor for Oceania since 1992 and has delivered over 800 Maeda crawlers. The addition of the Sennebogen franchise allowed the company to offer their customers a full line of tele boom crawler cranes of size classes up to 130t but while the 40, 50 and 70-tonners remain their best sellers, the smaller models now capture some 25% of demand.

Originally introduced in 2016 but now in a second-generation, the 6t capacity Jekko SPK 60-2 is a machine with very-high specification criteria. This second generation model features new software with a self-diagnostic system and automatically selects the working slope. Despite being in a highly price-competitive market, Jekko has spared nothing in the way of specification features. Topping its 17.7m five-section boom is a choice of four jibs including a 7.5m telescopic luffing fly jib. It’s the only swing cab mini crawler crane available with the option of electric instead of diesel power. Radio remote control, extendable tracks, FOPS cab and rubber/Geogrip extending crawlers are also available.

A Kobelco CK 120UR-3 under testing.

The Kobelco CK 90UR-3 is the third generation of this proven design. The latest version features a unique iNDr (Integrated Noise & Dust Reduction) cooling system with which airflow to the Isuzu engine from inlet to outlet is kept to a single duct within which the engine and cooling system are sited. To facilitate long work shifts at night or in tunnels, the Kobelco is equipped as standard with work lights and powered by a large 50A alternator.

Another unusual and valuable feature is that the main winch is mounted at the front of the crane superstructure deck which allows the crane operator to visually check rope spooling, etc, from his cab seat. Also, to reduce servicing demands the CK 90UR-3 uses longlife hydraulic oil that only needs changing at 5,000hr intervals.

Justin Potter, sales manager for Australian Crane & Machinery told Cranes Today that Adelaidebased McMahon Services Australia had acquired a CK 90UR-3 as well as a 250t Kobelco CK 2500G- 2. “The market is pretty solid at present and we have had good success with Kobelco telecrawler cranes in both Australia and New Zealand. McMahon are using the CK 90UR-3 on slab work using the fully extended five section boom at maximum elevation”.

One of the most wellestablished cranes on the market is Sennebogen’s 613. Originally introduced in 1992, at Bauma Sennebogen introduced its ‘E’ generation, the only machine in the class available in both crawler and wheel-mounted versions. While the wheel-mount remains very popular in Central Europe, the 613 crawler has found a ready market in Oceania where crane hire companies such as Preston Crane Hire and WGC have acquired significant fleets of Sennebogen crawlers. In addition to fifteen swing cab Maedas, Preston has the largest fleet of Sennebogen tele crawlers operating in Oceania including six 613s with units currently working in Australia, New Zealand and Papua New Guinea.

The first ‘E’ Generation 613 models sold in Australia have been acquired by All Terrain Services in Perth, WA and Coopers Heavy Industries in NSW. All Terrain Services specializes in Manitou and Magni telehandlers and has operated Maeda minis for around ten years. The Sennebogen is part of a strategy to extend their telecrawler fleet into larger classes.

Demand for these machines is coming from a whole range of applications including infrastructure construction as well as maritime construction, mining, demolition and civil construction. According to general manager Todd Jackson, “This demand is due to a greater focus on safety and efficiency in the workplace… as well as projects becoming more congested and technically more difficult in their construction.” Jackson purchased the 613E complete with the optional rubber pads, 5m fly jib and 1.75m elevating MultiCab and it joins a crane fleet that includes 20 and 25t Frannas, a 110t Tadano, 140t Demag AC 140 and a new 220t AC 220-5 Demag.

Even in the deeply-depressed UK crawler crane market, Sennebogen’s well-established distributor AGD Equipment succeeded in placing two 613Es on the £7bn ThamesLink London rail network project where duties include back-up on man-riding duties on deep shafts. AGD’s managing director Robert Law told Cranes Today that the compact dimensions and quality of the 613E as well as its elevating operator’s cab were key criteria in intense negotiations with the contractor.

While the UK market may be down, Sennebogen is enjoying particularly strong sales of tele and lattice crawlers across the Channel. Sygmat, the Sennebogen distributor recently delivered the first 30t 633E to ATM-Levage based in Valento, SE Paris who are making something of a specialty of tele crawlers. It joins a fleet that includes 16t Sennebogen 613Es (R & M), 70t 673E and 120t 6113E as well as Maeda LC 383, LC 785, CC 985 and CC 1485. At Bauma ATM ordered the first CC 1908 in France – their 16th Maeda in 2 years. Meanwhile Mategrues based in Beauchamp NW of Paris specializes in the bare (or dry) rent of tele crawler cranes having recently added a 16t 613E to a fleet that includes Sennebogen 630R, 643R and 653R of 30, 40 and 50t capacity.

A Maeda CC1485, sold to All Terrain Services by Pace, demonstrates the ability of minicrawlers to work in the most restricted of spaces

Maeda has also expanded its French dealer network, appointing Klaas All Road for the Picardie and Champagne-Ardennes region who ordered four spider cranes as well as CC 423 and CC 985 swing cab models.

In recent years Marchetti has placed considerable emphasis on the development of its line of telecrawlers, which now numbers five models to 70t capacity. The smallest of these is the 25t CW 25/35 ‘Sherpina’, the best-selling model in its size class in the European market. Key to the popularity of the Sherpina are its 25m five-section ‘droop-snoot’ boom, very short transport length, low weight, 2.5m transport width and reliability. To date there are over 20 Sherpinas working in the UK alone.

“It’s absolutely bullet-proof” says AGD’s Law. “Marchetti build a simple, strong crane and ultimately that’s what most customers want. The Sherpina is also extremely compact, easy to transport and small enough to access very confined sites”. Farnborough, Hants-based TCA Lifting is the latest UK crane hire company to add the Sherpina to its tele crawler crane fleet.Designed to somewhat different parameters is the T35 produced by Osima, Ancona, Italy-based MAIT. Well known for their line of foundation machines and lattice cranes, the T 35 is MAIT’s first tele crawler and is aimed at their traditional markets. The 30t capacity crane is a true heavy-duty machine of 39.5t working weight and powered by a 129kW Cummins driving a 93kN main hoist with 20mm wire rope and 40kN aux hoist with 16mm rope. MAIT point to contractor’s ability to transport this crane as a complete single load as its key advantage over lattice foundation cranes.

Top 10 tower crane companies 2019

By Leila Steed16 September 2019

Specialized Transport (ICST) magazine has published its 2019 ranking of the world’s 20 largest tower crane fleets.

Calculated as the total maximum load moment rating, in tonne-metres, of all the tower cranes in a company’s fleet, this year saw the combined total IC Tower index up from 3,920,859 tonne-metres in 2018 to 4,966,242 this year. 

Analysis of the Tower Index shows that in just five years the total capability rating has more than doubled, with the top five companies having a combined rating of 3,297,278 tonne-metres – which almost matches 2017’s total for all the companies on the list.

Over the past year over 4,000 cranes have been added to the fleets of the top 20 companies. This is a 32% increase on 2018’s figure, which had shown just a 2.72% rise on 2017. While 2019’s increase was accompanied by a rise of 6,000 employees across all the tower companies on the list, it also came with a 13% decrease in the number of depots and resulted in some interesting changes to the 10 companies at the top of 2019’s IC Tower Index.

Top 10 tower crane companies in 2019

1. Shanghai Pangyuan Machinery Rental (SPMR)

Shanghai Panguan Machinery Rental makes it to number one on the IC Towers Index after doubling the size of its tower crane fleet

Rising from third place in 2018, the past twelve months have seen the Chinese giant more than double its tower crane fleet and almost triple its staff numbers. With 2,059 depots worldwide, almost 9,500 employees and a Zoomlion D2500-120 crowning its tower crane fleet, SPMR has an IC Tower Index of 1,161,158 tonne-metres – up from 447,624 in 2018.

2. NFT

Last year’s number one on the list has moved into second position this year with an index of 1,075,895. Based in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), the company’s 2,586 tower cranes are headed up by an 80 tonne Potain MD 2200. In 2017 the crane supplier opened a new facility in Abu Dhabi, UAE, to house its rental fleet of more than 1,800 cranes. This year NFT has increased its total fleet by nearly 600 units.
Shanghai Panguan Machinery Rental makes it to number one on the IC Towers Index after doubling the size of its tower crane fleet

3. Liebherr Tower Crane Division

Liebherr cranes at Bauma 2019

While the company only rents internally – to its own distribution and sales network – the fact that the company does not operate in the wider tower crane market and still came in at number three on this year’s list, gives a clear indication of how large it is. With a Liebherr 4000 HC 100 leading its fleet of 1,747 towers, the company has an IC Tower Index of 492,784, which marks a sizeable split between the top two companies on the list and rest of the top ten.

4. Uperio 

Newly formed from the union of Belgian company Acromet and France-based Matebat, Uperio appears on the Tower Index for the first time with a rating of 324,487. The company, which has 550 employees operating from 23 depots worldwide, counts a Potain MD 689 M25 as its largest tower crane

5. Tat Hong Equipment Service

A non-mover at number five, the Chinese company’s fleet of 1,063 tower cranes totalled an IC Tower Index of 242,954. Over the past year Tat Hong Equipment Service has increased its tower crane offering by over 130 units and employed more than 250 extra employees, while also reducing its number of depots by six. This appears to indicate significant changes in the efficiency management of the company.

6. WolffkranSHOW FULLSCREEN

A Wolffkran 355B model tower crane

The Wolffkran 355B model tower crane

Wolffkran holds its place at number six this year, with a Tower Index of 202,769. The Switzerland-based company, which announced the appointment of Duncan Salt as its new CEO earlier this month, has 19 depots and 729 tower cranes spread across the globe. 

7. Morrow Equipment

With three less depots and over 100 less tower cranes than last year, Morrow Equipment has slipped three places from fourth position in 2018 to number seven this year. Over the past year the company has made significant changes to its fleet composition, which is likely a result of the acquisition of Morrow Australia and New Zealand by Liebherr-Australia. In 2019 Morrow Equipment achieved an IC Tower Index of 201,581.

8. Maxim Crane Works

Maxim Crane Works supplied 11 tower cranes for the Brickell City Centre in Miami, US.

Maxim takes the number eight spot again this year. The US company now has 56 branches worldwide and 373 tower crane units, giving it a total maximum load moment rating of 163,909 on the Tower Index.

Operating on a national level, Maxim also made the ranks of this year’s ACT100.

9. Neremat

Climbing up from tenth place in 2018, this Belgian company’s fleet of 506 tower cranes resulted in a Tower Index of 132,189. Over the past 12 months the company has kept its 17 depots, despite reducing its fleet of towers by 50 units.

10. Bigge Crane and Rigging

In operation for more than a century, 2019 sees the company move up one place on the Tower Index. Its 242 tower cranes, headed up by a

Bigge Crane and Rigging president Weston Settlemier

Comedil CTT 721-40B, give the US company an IC Tower Index of 122,510 tonne-metres. Bigge also made it onto this year’s ACT100, published by ICST’s sister magazine American Cranes and Transport. 

IC Tower Index

Companies are ranked by their IC Tower Index, calculated as the total maximum load moment rating, in tonne-metres, of all tower cranes in a fleet. all companies in the list, plus other prospective ones, have the opportunity to supply fleet information and other data. Where companies supply the full data the figure used is calculated by them. In cases of insolvency, acquisition or lack of information, companies are withdrawn from the table.

While we make great effort to ensure the accuracy of information provided, it cannot be guaranteed and International Cranes and Specialized Transport and its publisher, KHL Group, accept no liability for inaccuracies or omissions.

The IC Tower Crane Index will next be updated in the first half of 2020. If you think your company should be included please contact ICST for an application form.

Final preparations underway for World Crane and Transport Summit

By Murray Pollok29 October 2019

Final preparations are underway for the seventh World Crane and Transport Summit (WCTS) in Amsterdam on 13 and 14 November.

Highlights in the programme include keynote presentations by Fabio Belli, CEO of Fagioli, and Erich Sennebogen, managing director of Sennebogen Maschinenfabrik.SHOW FULLSCREEN

WCTS 2019 logo - RGB

Belli will give delegates a detailed view of business trends in the oil and gas sector and the impact on heavy lift and transport companies.

In other presentations engineers from the Hinkley Point C nuclear power project in the UK will report on lifting procedures being used on the site, where Saren’s massive SGC 250 crane is operating.

The key topic of safety will be addressed by speakers including Peter Gibbs, COO of Ainscough Crane Hire, and Blanca Claeyssens of ASA France, while crane operator training will be discussed by Philip Grootenboer of Mammoet and ESTA director Ton Klijn.SHOW FULLSCREEN

EDF-Sarens

Saren’s SGC 250 crane working at Hinkley Point C. (Photo: EDF Energy)

Online booking for the event is available at www.khl-wcts.com and the same site gives access to registration at the host hotel, the Grand Hotel Krasnapolsky.

You may be eligible for a discount on the delegate price if you are a member of an association such as SC&RA or ESTA, among others. For more information, contact:

Julia Bossie
Tel: +44 (0)1892 786204
e-mail: julia.bossie@khl.com

Event App
For the first time at WCTS there will be a dedicated mobile phone App for the event, providing information on the programme, speakers and the venue. If you are attending the Summit you can download the App as follows:

1. Download the ‘CC Events’ App from the App Store or Google Play.
2. Enter the event code: wcts2019
3. Sign-in to the App using your e-mail address and set your own password.
4. Finally, enter the event passcode again: wcts2019

The WCTS is organised by KHL Group and International Cranes and Specialized Transport. Supporting associations include the SC&RA, ESTA and the Hong Kong Professional Hoisting Engineering Association (HKPHEA).

Employees don’t leave Companies, they leave Managers

Brigette HyacinthAuthor: The Future of Leadership: Rise of Automation, Robotics and Artificial Intelligence 🔹 Keynote Speaker 🔹

Employees join companies but leave managers. A Gallup poll of more 1 million employed U.S. workers concluded that the No. 1 reason people quit their jobs is a bad boss or immediate supervisor. 75% of workers who voluntarily left their jobs did so because of their bosses and not the position itself. In spite of how good a job may be, people will quit if the reporting relationship is not healthy. “People leave managers not companies…in the end, turnover is mostly a manager issue.”

Here are the four types of bad bosses that make employees want to quit companies:

1) “Marionette” – In an age of uncertainty, many managers are yielding to this trap of just playing it safe to preserve their position and privileges. They just follow orders. They never stand up for their team or question policies. They are mere puppets and exude no loyalty to employees. A lack of integrity in a manager can make an employee lose passion for the job.

” Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress.” ~Richard Branson 

2) “King Kong” – Some managers when they reach to the top immediately forget where they came from. These type of managers possess a superiority complex and like to draw the distinction between management and staff. It is dreadful to work under a manager who is more worried about pushing their weight around than building relationships. Great leaders don’t talk down to their employees or make them feel inferior. Respect is a must.

c

3) “Superman” – They think the organization revolves around them. Some start behaving like they are the owners of the company. This trap includes making all of the decisions solo, ignoring feedback and taking the credit. When employees don’t feel appreciated, morale and engagement plummets.

” Leaders who don’t listen will eventually be surrounded by people who have nothing to say.” ~Andy Stanley 

4) “Taskmaster” – Their sole focus is on the bottomline. Continuously drilling employees is a sure way make them unhappy at work. Micromanagement suffocates, demoralizes and kills creativity. If you hired someone, it means you believe they are capable of doing the job. A manager’s job is to motivate and provide guidance and support. It’s not constantly monitoring an employee’s every movement.

A bad boss can take a good staff and destroy it, causing the best employees to flee and the remainder to lose all motivation. 

A bad boss creates fear and makes work drudgery. Studies show having a bad boss raises a worker’s chance of having a heart attack by as much as 60 per cent. What was it about a bad manager that increased the risk of heart disease? The stress and anxiety caused by unfeasible targets, lack of support, unfair practices and threats of punishment.

I received this email from Steve:

“I got a call my wife had been in a serious car accident. I told my boss I needed to leave immediately. He asked me to give him 10 more minutes. I was so disappointed because he could have covered for me. I come in early. I leave late. I hardly take any sick leave and that was the response I got from him? I looked at him and walked straight out the door. My relationship with my manager went south after that. I started planning my exit strategy and within 3 months, I quit.”

When you go beyond the call of duty for your employer, and they respond with inflexibility during your time of need, the relationship at that exact moment is lost.

Bad bosses are the No. 1 cause of unhappiness at work. People see the company only through their immediate boss. Employees know when they are on shaky ground. A manager who keeps throwing employees under the bus will create an atmosphere of anxiety and distrust. A recent study says that 56% of employees would turn down a 10% raise to stay with a great boss.Treat employees fairly, reward them for their hard work and they will give 110%.

There are too many individuals in positions who abuse their power. This is why good employees quit jobs. A culture of blaming, punishment, inflexibility and insensitivity only pushes people away. Employees want managers who are leaders. Managers who will inspire them, who are fair and honest and will stand up for their team.

I have seen too many exceptional employees become disheartened, stop caring, and just go through the motions until they find another job. Managers please use the human-to-human approach when dealing with employees. It’s people you are dealing with and not just a statistic on a graph. Get to know your people, meet them where they are and be flexible. You can’t buy loyalty but you can earn it. If you want loyal employees – Treat your people well!

  • Published on December 27, 2017

CITB to review 2,500 tests after fraud arrests

18 OCT 2019 BY  MEGAN KELLY 

Some 2,500 Construction Industry Training Board (CITB) tests are to be reviewed after arrests for alleged fraud offences at the sites.

Three men involved in running CITB health, safety and environment tests were arrested for fraud offences after it was found that they were giving answers to candidates in exchange for money.

The CITB will now review more than 2,500 tests conducted at three health, safety and environment test centres in the past year and then decide whether or not to revoke the certificates.

Seven construction workers were also detained on suspicion of working illegally in Britain, following the unannounced counter-fraud visits, which were carried out alongside the police and Home Office.

Candidates admitted paying up to 25 times more than the test was meant to cost them at test centres in Cheshire, Essex and London, spending up to £500 to take the HS&E test worth £21.

The centres are run by private companies and audited by the CITB.

At the Cheshire site, a staff member admitted helping candidates choose the correct answers, a CITB statement said. It added that a “considerable amount of cash” was also found “without a plausible explanation”.

A candidate at the centre was detained and bailed on suspicion of being in the country illegally.

Staff members at the Essex centre admitted to administrators being paid to give correct answers during the test.

At the London centre, the Metropolitan Police arrested a man over facilitating corrupt tests for other candidates. He has since been released under investigation pending further enquiries.

Fake documentation and card making equipment was seized from a number of test centres.

CITB fraud manager Ian Sidney said that the body has “considerable experience in auditing test centres all over the country” and is working with the Home Office and law enforcement to ensure a “safe working environment”.

So far in 2019, CITB has shut down 17 test centres involved in delivery of fraudulent tests or qualifications, its statement said.

The training board has called for anyone with information about fraudulent testing in construction tocontact the organisation.

In September, after CN reported on fake CSCS cards being issued to victims of modern slavery, CITB chief executive Sarah Beale told CN that the issue of CSCS card fraud is not a widespread one.

She said: “There are very, very [few] instances and a small number of centres [in the] last several years that have committed fraud.”

Chernobyl NSC wins project management accolade

Wednesday 9 October 2019

As part of its 50th anniversary celebrations, the Project Management Institute has named Chernobyl’s New Safe Confinement (NSC) as one of the 50 most influential projects of the past 50 years.

Financed by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) as well as 45 donor nations, the NSC project took 22 years to complete and was handed over to the Ukrainian authorities in July 2019.

It involved covering and sealing off Reactor Unit 4 of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in Ukraine, which was destroyed in a steam explosion in April 1986.

The total cost of the Shelter Implementation Plan for Chernobyl, which entailed more than 300 separate projects including the NSC, was USD2.3 billion.

The NSC is a huge, USD1.6 billion arch that was constructed in two parts and slid into place over the reactor in 2016. It replaced a concrete covering that had been built quickly during the seven months following the disaster and had become unstable.

The arch weighs 36,000 tonnes; it is 105 m tall, 165 m long and spans 256 m. It was designed by a Bechtel-led consortium and constructed by Novarka – a joint venture between French companies Bouygues Travaux Publics and Vinci Construction.

“Completing the NSC took an all-in effort by the whole team,” said Bechtel project manager Oscar McNeil. “It required international cooperation and ingenuity to overcome the challenges presented by radiation and the environment around the plant, not to mention the Ukrainian winters.”

Construction of each half of the structure involved three jack-up operations, so that it was in effect built from the top down. This allowed construction to take place at a lower height. Building the arch in two parts, meanwhile, reduced the jack-up capacity required, thus lowering the cost of the job.

Heavy lift and transportation specialist Mammoet developed a customised jacking system for the project. Strand jacks were housed in special containers placed on top of the jacking tower sections to allow easy removal of the strand jacks for scheduled maintenance while jacking towers were relocated.

The company also developed a bespoke software system to allow up to 60 strand jacks to be used simultaneously. Cameras in each container monitored the reels and jacks, while a customised method of protecting the strand wires against the elements minimised potential downtime.

In order to minimise exposure of workers to radiation, the arch was built 300 m away from the reactor site. Once finished, the two halves of the structure were joined together and the complete NSC was then slid into its final position on rails.

The NSC is expected to remain in place, sealing out the elements and containing radioactivity, for 100 years – by which time it is hoped that radiation levels will have dropped sufficiently to allow demolition of the reactor building.

www.pmi.org

www.mammoet.com

www.bouygues-tp.com

www.vinciconstruction.co.uk

www.bechtel.com

www.novarka.com